Over the next few weeks, you may notice several new pages on my blog. I am attempting to add some more theology discussions and will try to update my Gospel pages, also. (Warning–some of the theology pages are papers written for school, so some may be a bit dry! Most will be lengthier than a typical post, also.) I think you will find these especially thought provoking, so be sure and check ’em out!
The title of a USA Today article caught my attention today: “Gays, lesbians call for Salvation Army boycott.” I hope that reading that title shocks you as much as it did me. Who could possibly justify boycotting the Salvation Army?!?! That’s worse that slamming the door on a girl scout! So what’s all the fuss about? Here’s a snippet of the relevant portions of SA’s stance on homosexuality:
sexual intimacy is understood as a gift of God to be enjoyed within the context of heterosexual marriage…Apart from marriage, the scriptural standard is celibacy.
Scripture forbids sexual intimacy between members of the same sex. The Salvation Army believes, therefore, that Christians whose sexual orientation is primarily or exclusively same-sex are called upon to embrace celibacy as a way of life. There is no scriptural support for same-sex unions as equal to, or as an alternative to, heterosexual marriage.
What is the response of the lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender (LGBT) community? As stated on the Boycott the Salvation Army Facebook Page:
”There are many organizations that also do good things, but it doesn’t make them justified in holding prejudiced beliefs or fighting to keep gay people from being treated equally. And there are plenty of charities that are willing to do good for people without supporting needless intolerance. The Salvation Army is not alone in providing help to those in need. But it is set apart by its choice to endorse bigotry.”
Note several important key phrases/concepts that this LGBT group uses of the SA: “prejudiced,” supporting unequal treatment of LGBT’s, intolerant, and bigoted. But are these really accurate descriptions of the SA? Perhaps a lesson from Dictionary.com will help. A bigot is “a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. [To be a bigot] is to be so emotionally or subjectively attached to one’s own belief as to be hostile to all others.” Intolerant: “not tolerating or respecting beliefs, opinions, usages,manners, etc., different from one’s own, as in political or religious matters; bigoted.”
So, do we find in the SA an organization that is “utterly intolerant,” “hostile,” or disrespectful of LGBT’s? Is the SA guilty of treating LGBT’s as inferior or sub-human? Continue reading the SA statement on homosexuality:
Likewise, there is no scriptural support for demeaning or mistreating anyone for reason of his or her sexual orientation. The Salvation Army opposes any such abuse. In keeping with these convictions, the services of The Salvation Army are available to all who qualify, without regard to sexual orientation. The fellowship of Salvation Army worship is open to all sincere seekers of faith in Christ, and membership in The Salvation Army church body is open to all who confess Christ as Savior and who accept and abide by The Salvation Army’s doctrine and discipline.
That doesn’t sound like an organization I would label “bigoted” or “intolerant.” In fact, one might well accuse those who–because of their difference in beliefs–would withhold donations to such a charitable organization! Many churches, unfortunately, we might aptly describe as “bigoted” and “intolerant.” Such bigoted churches refuse to allow LGBT’s (or those living in any type of sinful lifestyle) to attend worship service or, at least, make them feel unwelcome or inferior. However, what we find in this case is not that the church is being intolerant toward the LGBT’s, but that the LGBT’s are intolerant of any organization that disagrees with their chosen lifestyle. It is truly ironic when people point fingers and say “You’re a bigot because you disagree with my beliefs.”
The fact is, we are all intolerant bigots to some degree. Only those who hold absolutely no moral convictions, whatsoever, can claim to be unbiased. But even these are likely biased against those who do have moral convictions! The underlying issue here is truth. If, as pop-culture asserts, truth is relative and there is no absolute moral standard, then it is wrong to assert that the beliefs of others are wrong. But one can see the obvious fault in this argumentation–“Because there is no absolute right or wrong, it is wrong to condemn others’ beliefs.” Hmm…
This should simply remind us that there is an ultimate standard of right and wrong. Even those who argue otherwise are condemned by the fallacy of their own argument. As Christians, we should not shy away from this sense of right and wrong just because our culture asserts that truth is relative and labels us bigots. Remember the words of Christ in John 15:18-25:
“If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A slave is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word, they will keep yours also. But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know the One who sent Me. If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin. He who hates Me hates My Father also. If I had not done among them the works which no one else did, they would not have sin; but now they have both seen and hated Me and My Father as well. But they have done this to fulfill the word that is written in their Law, ‘THEY HATED ME WITHOUT A CAUSE.’ (NASB)
The fact is that there is an ultimate standard of truth: God. As sinful, rebellious human beings, we despise higher authority. We, in our sinful human natures, are God-haters. We despise the God that tells us what is right and what is wrong, even though his laws are for our own good. We should not be surprised, therefore, when unbelievers scorn this law and condemn it as narrow-minded. After all, Jesus said that there was only one way to God, and it was through him (John 14:6). After all, they hated Jesus first.
I do not agree with all of the SA’s beliefs (namely, that you can lose your salvation), but I do agree with most of their beliefs, and I think they’ve nailed this one. We, as Christians, should openly condemn homosexuality for what it is–sin. But, we should never endorse the mistreatment of those living in sin (nor should we endorse “homophobic” behavior), but should openly demonstrate the love that God demonstrated to us, “in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom 5:8). The SA does this. They “hate the sin, but love the sinner.” They discriminate between the right and wrong ways to live but don’t discriminate against who they show Christ’s love to. This is the attitude every Christian should have. So, this Christmas, let’s boycott the boycott and show the world that Christ loves the poor and needy.
Today as I was reading Psalm 59, an obvious truth struck me that I have overlooked so many times in my reading of the Psalms. Oftentimes when I have read psalms of David I have noted in passing that some of his psalms are from times of extreme difficulty, especially when he was being chased by the mentally instable King Saul. But, what I have so often missed is the depth of emotion expressed in these psalms. When you realize that David’s very life was being threatened by the ruler of the most powerful nation in the known world, you begin to get a taste of the gravity of the situation. I can only imagine the hopelessness and fear that must have overcome him when he saw the massive armies of trained warriors pursuing him. Saul was out for blood—David’s blood. Yet, did David despair? No. Instead, he prayed to God, his “shield, stronghold, and refuge.”
Secondly, David was unwilling to strike at his enemies personally, but realized that God had the power to bring them to destruction in due time (and was unafraid to pray for just that!). Realizing that he was not that he was not being punished for sinning against Saul (vv. 3-4), David could have responded in one of two inappropriate ways: 1) get even with Saul by killing him and assuming the throne, and/or 2) charge God with injustice for allowing such events to occur. David did neither. Frankly, my reaction to such events may have been one of these two options! But, instead, David prayed for God to bring about the deliverance through the destruction of the wicked. While such a prayer may rub modern readers the wrong way (as they think such language to be incompatible with a “God of love”), David realized that God is just and righteous. Praise be to God that he does not allow injustice to go unpunished! What an awful world this would be if He did!
From David’s experiences in Psalm 59, I can see a direct application to my life. This past May, I was fired from my job unexpectedly. While I was not perfect at my job (who is?), it was not entirely clear to me that my firing was necessarily a result of my “sins,” since I had put forth my best effort to do my job well and had received praise from coworkers for my hard work. Fortunately, this occurred during a period of intense spiritual growth and during that time I had felt that God was preparing me for a difficult time to come. Was He ever! While I often wondered what good God intended to bring about from that situation, God provided the faith necessary for me to trust Him. Indeed, through that trial, God brought me to Louisville to attend seminary, an experience that in hindsight I would not trade for the brief humiliation and pain I endured in May.
When such sufferings/trials occur, we ought not to withdraw from God or charge Him with injustice, but rather flee to God as our refuge! After all, God is the only one who has the ability to alleviate the suffering! While it is easy to trust God when all is well, it is through the hard times in life that we learn to have faith.
“But as for me, I shall sing of Your strength; yes, I shall joyfully sing of Your lovingkindness in the morning, for You have been my stronghold and a refuge in the day of my distress. O my strength, I will sing praises to You; for God is my stronghold, the God who shows me lovingkindness.”
–Psalm 59:16-17 (NASB)
Welcome to my new blog!
I hope that you will find this blog helpful. I created it for several reasons, which can be readily deduced from the menu options above. First, as an easy way to keep family back in Arkansas updated on what is going on in our lives. Secondly, I hope that anyone that happens to stumble across my blog who is seeking a personal relationship with Jesus Christ will find the information that they need to make that decision. A complete presentation of how you can have such a personal relationship with Christ can be found by clicking The Gospel menu above. Furthermore, a brand new Christian will find helpful resources on beginning their walk with Christ in the Fellowship and Discipleship tab. Third, I hope that this blog will serve as a valuable resource for any Christians who are interested in getting more involved in missions, whether domestic or foreign. Fourth, as you will see, I have an unquenchable penchant for theological discussions and debates; I am drawn to controversy like a magnet! So, rather than subject my wife to hour long lectures about the nature of one’s predestination to salvation or how Christians should respond to hot button topics like abortion, homosexuality, etc. (which she oh so much enjoys!), I’ve decided to just put them in writing instead (see Theology. Please read the disclaimer first!). I figure if she’s interested, she can read my blog, too. 😉 So, that’s pretty much it. As I find new topics to add to my blog, the menus may change. I hope you’ll enjoy reading and please feel free to comment, agree, or disagree with me. That’s why it’s a blog, not a book!